Houston Chronicle,
11th June 2003
New Road Map: One State, Modelled After U.S.
Tarif Abboushi
Barely a week after President Bush attempted to kick-start the latest Middle
East peace process with the Red Sea summit in Jordan, the bloodletting in the
Holy Land has resumed with its usual vengeance. Keeping a tally of how many
Israelis and Palestinians kill each other requires daily vigilance because it's
a daily occurrence. The road map might more aptly have been named road kill.
Bush is to be commended for taking the Middle East bull by its horns and
committing to ride hard. Time will show that the map of the ranch will have to
be redrawn if the bucking broncos are ever to be tamed.
One of the road map's failings is that, like the Oslo peace process that
preceded it to such disastrous effect, it avoids discussion of the most
contentious issues - borders, settlements, Jerusalem and the Palestinian
refugees - until the end-stage "final status" negotiations, so they can cause
the process to unravel later rather than sooner. Another failing is in the
unequal demands the road map places on the two warring parties. One example is
the onus on the Palestinians to draft and adopt a constitution, while Israel is
allowed to continue without one.
A more logical approach is to address all the issues - the tough ones at the
head of the list - up front, and to frame everything strictly in the context of
American values of governance. There is only one solution that is consistent
with American-style democracy, and it resolves all the issues to the
satisfaction of all but those on both sides who preach exclusionist segregation.
It involves defeating those on the Palestinian side whose avowed aim is to
create an Islamic nation in all of historic Palestine, an unacceptable recipe
because it means the destruction of Israel and the disenfranchisement of the
Holy Land's Jews and Christians. It also involves defeating those on the Israeli
side who espouse Jewish domination of the land, because that leaves the Muslims
and Christians with not just the short straw, but no straw at all.
The two-state solution in the Holy Land is objectionable for the same reason the
international community rejected it in South Africa, where it would have meant a
state for blacks alongside a white state still built on - and practicing -
apartheid principles. Two infrastructures must be dismantled for peace in the
Holy Land: the infrastructure of terror - the targeting of innocent civilians by
whichever group or government - and the infrastructure of racism - the
state-sanctioned laws that assign rights, privileges and obligations to people
based solely on their religion.
Jews have a right to live in peace and security anywhere in the world, including
in the Middle East, and nowhere more so than in the Holy Land. Equally so
Christians and Muslims. This is disputed only by those who give precedence to
religion over human rights; those who, in America, we regard as religious
fanatics.
There's only one solution, with the emphasis on "one", and it is modelled after
this country. One state. One set of borders. One constitution. One set of laws
that treats all citizens - regardless of race, color, religion or sex, as one.
No need to dismantle a single Jewish settlement. The Palestinian refugees can
all return to their ancestral homeland or be adequately compensated if they
choose not to. Ditto for the Jews who left other countries - including Arab ones
- to go to Israel. Jerusalem, the eternal capital of the Holy Land, as home to
Jews, Christians and Muslims.
Idealistic? Of course. But not more so than the values America's founding
fathers espoused when they charted the future of our nation, and drafted the
document that has so endured as the cornerstone of our democracy. We don't need
to draft a new constitution for Iraq. We've already got one as hale as any has
ever been hailed to be. We just change a few names and addresses, and we're
done. And it's the same one we should impose on all the other autocracies and
dictatorships in the Middle East as we pursue the democratization of that
region.
More than any other territory in the world, the Holy Land deserves nothing less.
The only rejectionists that must be allowed to flourish are those who reject
terrorism, violence, segregation and racism. All others are obstacles to peace.
America should use its power, and wielding its Constitution, its moral
authority, defeat them.