Arab Office Submission to
Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry
Submitted by the Arab Office, Jerusalem, to the Anglo-American Commission of
Inquiry, March 1946 (sections 8-14)
8. In the Arab view, any solution of the problem created by Zionist aspirations
must satisfy certain conditions:
(i) It must recognize the right of the indigenous inhabitants of Palestine to
continue in occupation of the country and to preserve its traditional character.
(ii) It must recognize that questions like immigration which affect the whole
nature and destiny of the country should be decided in accordance with
democratic principles by the will of the population.
(iii) It must accept the principle that the only way by which the will of the
population can be expressed is through the establishment of responsible
representative government.
(The Arabs find something inconsistent in the attitude of Zionists who demand
the establishment of a free democratic commonwealth in Palestine and then hasten
to add that this should not take place until the Jews are in a majority.)
(iv) This representative government should be based upon the principle of
absolute equality of all citizens irrespective of race and religion.
(v) The form of government should be such as to make possible the development of
a spirit of loyalty and cohesion among all elements of the community which will
override all sectional attachments. In other words it should be a government
which the whole community could regard as their own, which should be rooted in
their consent and have a moral claim upon their obedience.
(vi) The settlement should recognize the fact that by geography and history
Palestine is inescapably part of the Arab world; that the only alternative to
its being part of the Arab world, and accepting the implication of its position,
is complete isolation, which would be disastrous from every point of view; and
that whether they like it or not the Jews in Palestine are dependent upon the
goodwill of the Arabs.
(vii) The settlement should be such as to make possible a satisfactory
definition, within the framework of the United Nations Organization, of the
relations between Palestine and the Western powers who possess interests in the
country.
(The settlement should take into account that Zionism is essentially a political
movement aiming at the creation of a Jewish state and should therefore avoid
making any concessions which might encourage Zionists in the hope that their aim
can be achieved in any circumstances.)
9. In accordance with these principles, the Arabs urge the establishment in
Palestine of a democratic government representative of all sections of the
population on a level of absolute equality; the termination of the Mandate once
the government has been established; and the entry of Palestine into the United
Nations Organization as a full member of the working community.
Pending the establishment of a representative government, all further Jewish
immigration should be stopped, in pursuance of the principle that a decision on
so important a matter should only be taken with the consent of the inhabitants
of the country and that until representative institutions are established there
is no way of determining consent. Strict measures should also continue to be
taken to check illegal immigration. Once a Palestinian state has come into
existence, if any section of the population favours a policy of further
immigration it will be able to press its case in accordance with normal
democratic procedure; but in this, as in other matters, the minority must abide
by the decision of the majority.
Similarly, all further transfer of land from Arabs to Jews should be prohibited
prior to the creation of self-governing institutions. The Land Transfer
Regulations should be made more stringent and extended to the whole area of the
country, and severer measures be taken to prevent infringement of them. Here
again once self-government exists matters concerning land will be decided in the
normal democratic manner.
10. The Arabs are irrevocably opposed to political Zionism, but in no way
hostile to the Jews as such nor to their Jewish fellow citizens of Palestine.
Those Jews who have already entered Palestine, and who have obtained or shall
obtain Palestinian citizenship by due legal process will be full citizens of the
Palestinian state, enjoying full civil and political rights and a fair share in
government and administration. There is no question of their being thrust into
the position of a "minority" in the bad sense of a closed community, which
dwells apart from the mainstream of the state's life and which exists by
sufferance of the majority. They will be given the opportunity of belonging to
and helping to mould the full community of the Palestinian state, joined to the
Arabs by links of interest and goodwill, not the goodwill of the strong to the
powerless, but of one citizen to another.
It is to be hoped that in course of time the exclusiveness of the Jews will be
neutralized by the development of loyalty to the state and the emergence of new
groupings which cut across communal divisions. This however will take time and
during the transitional period the Arabs recognize the need for giving special
consideration to the particular position and the needs of the Jews. No attempt
would be made to interfere with their communal organization, their personal
status or their religious observances. Their schools and cultural institutions
would be left to operate unchecked except for that general control which all
governments exercise over education. In the districts in which they are most
closely settled they would possess municipal autonomy and Hebrew would be an
official language of administration, justice, and education.
The Palestinian state would be an Arab state, not (as should be clear from the
preceding paragraph) in any narrow racial sense, nor in the sense that non-Arabs
should be placed in a position or inferiority, but because the form and policy
of its government would be based on a recognition of two facts: first that the
majority of the citizens are Arabs, and secondly that Palestine is part of the
Arab world and has no future except through close cooperation with the other
Arab states. Thus among the main objects of the government would be to preserve
and enrich the country's Arab heritage, and to draw closer the relations between
Palestine and the other Arab countries. The Cairo Pact of March 1945, provided
for the representation of Palestine on the Council of the Arab League even
before its independence should be a reality; once it was really self-governing
it would participate fully in all the work of the League, in the cultural and
economic no less than the political sphere. This would be of benefit to the
Jewish not less than the Arab citizens of Palestine since it would ensure those
good relations with the Arab world without which their economic development
would be impossible.
11. The state would apply as soon as possible for admission into the United
Nations Organization and would of course be prepared to bear its full share of
the burdens of establishing a world security system. It would willingly place at
the disposal of the Security Council whatever bases or other facilities were
required, provided those bases were really used for the purpose which they were
intended and not in order to interfere in the internal affairs of the country,
and provided also Palestine and the other Arab states were adequately
represented on the controlling body.
12. The state would recognize also the world's interest in the maintenance of a
satisfactory regime for the Moslem, Christian and Jewish Holy Places. In the
Arab view however the need for such a regime does not involve foreign
interference in, or control of, Palestine; no opportunity should be given to
Great Powers to use the Holy Places as instruments of policy. The Holy Places
can be most satisfactorily and appropriately guarded by a government
representative of the inhabitants, who include adherents of all three faiths and
have every interest in preserving the holy character of their country.
Nor in the Arab view would any sort of foreign interference or control be
justified by the need to protect the Christian minorities. The Christians are
Arabs, who belong fully to the national community and share fully in its
struggle. They would have all the rights and duties of citizens of a Palestinian
state, and would continue to have their own communal organizations and
institutions. They themselves would ask for no more, having learnt from the
example of other Middle Eastern countries the dangers of an illusory foreign
"protection" of minorities.
13. In economic and social matters the government of Palestine would follow a
progressive policy with the aim of raising the standard of living and increasing
the welfare of all sections off the population, and using the country’s natural
resources in the way most beneficial to all. Its first task naturally would be
to improve the condition or the Arab peasants and thus to bridge the economic
and social gulf which at present divides the two communities. Industry would be
encouraged, but only in so far as its economic basis was sound and as part of a
general policy of economic development for the whole Arab world; commercial and
financial contact with the other Arab countries would so far as possible be
strengthened, and tariffs decreased or abolished.
14. The Arabs believe that no other proposals would satisfy the conditions of a
just and lasting settlement. In their view there are insuperable objections of
principle or of practice to all other suggested solutions of the problem:
(i) The idea or partition and the establishment of a Jewish state in a part of
Palestine is inadmissible for the same reasons of principle as the idea of
establishing a Jewish state in the whole country. If it is unjust to the Arabs
to impose a Jewish state on the whole of Palestine, it is equally unjust to
impose it in any part of the country. Moreover, as the Woodhead Commission
showed, there are grave practical difficulties in the way of partition; commerce
would be strangled, communications dislocated and the public finances upset. It
would also be impossible to devise frontiers which did not leave a large Arab
minority in the Jewish state. This minority would not willingly accept its
subjection to the Zionists and it would not allow itself to be transferred to
the Arab state. Moreover, partition would not satisfy the Zionists. It cannot be
too often repeated that Zionism is a political movement aimed at the domination
at least of the whole of Palestine; to give it a foothold in part of Palestine
would be to encourage it to press for more and to provide it with a base for its
activities. Because of this, because of the pressure of population and in order
to escape from its isolation it would inevitably be thrown into enmity with the
surrounding Arab states and this enmity would disturb the stability of the whole
Middle East.
(ii) Another proposal is for the establishment of a bi-national state; based
upon political parity, in Palestine and its incorporation into a Syrian or Arab
Federation. The Arabs would reject this as denying the majority its normal
position and rights. There are also serious practical objections to the idea of
a bi-national state which cannot exist unless there is a strong sense of unity
and common interest overriding the differences between the two parties.
Moreover, the point made in regard to the previous suggestion may be repeated
here: this scheme would in no way satisfy the Zionists. It would simply
encourage them to hope for more and improve their chances of obtaining it.